↓ Skip to main content

Digital pills: a scoping review of the empirical literature and analysis of the ethical aspects

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Digital pills: a scoping review of the empirical literature and analysis of the ethical aspects
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12910-019-0443-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Martani, Lester Darryl Geneviève, Christopher Poppe, Carlo Casonato, Tenzin Wangmo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,464,826
of 15,220,640 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#171
of 669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,036
of 335,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#31
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,220,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.