You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Digital pills: a scoping review of the empirical literature and analysis of the ethical aspects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-019-0443-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Martani, Lester Darryl Geneviève, Christopher Poppe, Carlo Casonato, Tenzin Wangmo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 3 | 25% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Kenya | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Researcher | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,298,962
of 25,601,426 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#93
of 1,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,690
of 478,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,601,426 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.