↓ Skip to main content

Digitalis for treatment of congestive heart failure in patients in sinus rhythm

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Digitalis for treatment of congestive heart failure in patients in sinus rhythm
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002901.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hood WB Jr, Dans AL, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R, McMurray JJ, Hood, Jr., William B, Dans, Antonio L, Guyatt, Gordon H, Jaeschke, Roman, McMurray, John JV

Abstract

Digitalis glycosides have been in clinical use in the treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF) for more than 200 years. In recent years several trials have been conducted to address concerns about efficacy and toxicity. Although a systematic review of the literature was published in 1990, an update is required to include more current trials.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 8%
Chile 1 8%
Unknown 11 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 54%
Student > Master 5 38%
Student > Bachelor 4 31%
Student > Postgraduate 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Other 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 138%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Other 2 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,562,094
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,592
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,002
of 110,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.