↓ Skip to main content

Accepting higher morbidity in exchange for sacrificing fewer animals in studies developing novel infection-control strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Biomaterials, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accepting higher morbidity in exchange for sacrificing fewer animals in studies developing novel infection-control strategies
Published in
Biomaterials, February 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119737
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henk J. Busscher, Willem Woudstra, Theo G. van Kooten, Paul Jutte, Linqi Shi, Jianfeng Liu, Wouter L.J. Hinrichs, Hendrik W. Frijlink, Rui Shi, Jian Liu, Javad Parvizi, Stephen Kates, Vincent M. Rotello, Thomas P. Schaer, Dustin Williams, David W. Grainger, Henny C. van der Mei

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 13 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Chemistry 2 6%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 15 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2020.
All research outputs
#9,843,469
of 16,682,934 outputs
Outputs from Biomaterials
#6,869
of 8,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,079
of 385,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomaterials
#61
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,682,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.