You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Invested in Diabetes Study Protocol: a cluster randomized pragmatic trial comparing standardized and patient-driven diabetes shared medical appointments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-019-3938-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bethany M. Kwan, L. Miriam Dickinson, Russell E. Glasgow, Martha Sajatovic, Mark Gritz, Jodi Summers Holtrop, Don E. Nease, Natalie Ritchie, Andrea Nederveld, Dennis Gurfinkel, Jeanette A. Waxmonsky |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| India | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 119 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 50 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 15% |
| Psychology | 8 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 51 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,943,520
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#825
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,541
of 481,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#19
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.