↓ Skip to main content

Selective computed tomography (CT) versus routine thoracoabdominal CT for high-energy blunt-trauma patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Selective computed tomography (CT) versus routine thoracoabdominal CT for high-energy blunt-trauma patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009743.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raoul Van Vugt, Frederik Keus, Digna Kool, Jaap Deunk, Michael Edwards

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Egypt 1 1%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Master 12 14%
Other 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 15 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,281,604
of 14,579,200 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,628
of 11,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,955
of 262,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,579,200 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.