↓ Skip to main content

Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 1,514)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
209 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12874-020-0897-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannah Harrison, Simon J. Griffin, Isla Kuhn, Juliet A. Usher-Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 209 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Librarian 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 19 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 134. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2020.
All research outputs
#154,339
of 16,036,128 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#12
of 1,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,925
of 365,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#2
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,036,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.