↓ Skip to main content

Intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin versus mitomycin C for Ta and T1 bladder cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin versus mitomycin C for Ta and T1 bladder cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011935.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefanie Schmidt, Frank Kunath, Bernadette Coles, Desiree Louise Draeger, Laura-Maria Krabbe, Rick Dersch, Samuel Kilian, Katrin Jensen, Philipp Dahm, Joerg J Meerpohl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 211 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Student > Master 16 8%
Researcher 13 6%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 93 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Unspecified 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 109 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,689,320
of 25,863,888 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,274
of 13,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,434
of 479,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#94
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,863,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.