↓ Skip to main content

Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin versus mitomycin C for Ta and T1 bladder cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin versus mitomycin C for Ta and T1 bladder cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011935.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefanie Schmidt, Frank Kunath, Bernadette Coles, Desiree Louise Draeger, Laura-Maria Krabbe, Rick Dersch, Samuel Kilian, Katrin Jensen, Philipp Dahm, Joerg J Meerpohl

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Researcher 7 14%
Other 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 15 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,521,138
of 15,606,051 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,201
of 11,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,957
of 349,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,606,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.