↓ Skip to main content

Interim PET‐results for prognosis in adults with Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of prognostic factor studies

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
18 X users
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interim PET‐results for prognosis in adults with Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of prognostic factor studies
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012643.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela Aldin, Lisa Umlauff, Lise J Estcourt, Gary Collins, Karel Gm Moons, Andreas Engert, Carsten Kobe, Bastian von Tresckow, Madhuri Haque, Farid Foroutan, Nina Kreuzberger, Marialena Trivella, Nicole Skoetz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 162 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 15%
Student > Master 18 11%
Other 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Researcher 10 6%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 62 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 71 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,353,845
of 26,106,397 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,715
of 13,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,767
of 482,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.