↓ Skip to main content

Characterising and Predicting Benthic Biodiversity for Conservation Planning in Deepwater Environments

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterising and Predicting Benthic Biodiversity for Conservation Planning in Deepwater Environments
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0036558
Pubmed ID
Authors

Piers K. Dunstan, Franziska Althaus, Alan Williams, Nicholas J. Bax

Abstract

Understanding patterns of biodiversity in deep sea systems is increasingly important because human activities are extending further into these areas. However, obtaining data is difficult, limiting the ability of science to inform management decisions. We have used three different methods of quantifying biodiversity to describe patterns of biodiversity in an area that includes two marine reserves in deep water off southern Australia. We used biological data collected during a recent survey, combined with extensive physical data to model, predict and map three different attributes of biodiversity: distributions of common species, beta diversity and rank abundance distributions (RAD). The distribution of each of eight common species was unique, although all the species respond to a depth-correlated physical gradient. Changes in composition (beta diversity) were large, even between sites with very similar environmental conditions. Composition at any one site was highly uncertain, and the suite of species changed dramatically both across and down slope. In contrast, the distributions of the RAD components of biodiversity (community abundance, richness, and evenness) were relatively smooth across the study area, suggesting that assemblage structure (i.e. the distribution of abundances of species) is limited, irrespective of species composition. Seamounts had similar biodiversity based on metrics of species presence, beta diversity, total abundance, richness and evenness to the adjacent continental slope in the same depth ranges. These analyses suggest that conservation objectives need to clearly identify which aspects of biodiversity are valued, and employ an appropriate suite of methods to address these aspects, to ensure that conservation goals are met.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 2%
Norway 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 72 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Student > Master 9 11%
Other 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 48%
Environmental Science 17 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 14 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2012.
All research outputs
#20,113,891
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#175,799
of 223,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,223
of 176,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,912
of 3,857 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,857 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.