You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nutrient-wide association study of 92 foods and nutrients and breast cancer risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13058-019-1244-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alicia K. Heath, David C. Muller, Piet A. van den Brandt, Nikos Papadimitriou, Elena Critselis, Marc Gunter, Paolo Vineis, Elisabete Weiderpass, Guy Fagherazzi, Heiner Boeing, Pietro Ferrari, Anja Olsen, Anne Tjønneland, Patrick Arveux, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Francesca Romana Mancini, Tilman Kühn, Renée Turzanski-Fortner, Matthias B. Schulze, Anna Karakatsani, Paschalis Thriskos, Antonia Trichopoulou, Giovanna Masala, Paolo Contiero, Fulvio Ricceri, Salvatore Panico, Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Marije F. Bakker, Carla H. van Gils, Karina Standahl Olsen, Guri Skeie, Cristina Lasheras, Antonio Agudo, Miguel Rodríguez-Barranco, Maria-José Sánchez, Pilar Amiano, María-Dolores Chirlaque, Aurelio Barricarte, Isabel Drake, Ulrika Ericson, Ingegerd Johansson, Anna Winkvist, Tim Key, Heinz Freisling, Mathilde His, Inge Huybrechts, Sofia Christakoudi, Merete Ellingjord-Dale, Elio Riboli, Konstantinos K. Tsilidis, Ioanna Tzoulaki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 147 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 49 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 5% |
| Colombia | 4 | 3% |
| Chile | 4 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 2% |
| Sweden | 3 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Norway | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 60 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 125 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 10% |
| Scientists | 6 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 133 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Researcher | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 60 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 65 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#357,106
of 25,870,142 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#33
of 2,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,882
of 479,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.