↓ Skip to main content

Decoding Publication Records: Ruptures and Continuities in 1940s Taiwanese Literary History

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Asian Studies, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Decoding Publication Records: Ruptures and Continuities in 1940s Taiwanese Literary History
Published in
Journal of Asian Studies, January 2020
DOI 10.1017/s0021911819000706
Authors

Táňa Dluhošová

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,894,677
of 15,426,345 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asian Studies
#67
of 806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,854
of 343,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asian Studies
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,426,345 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 806 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.