You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bacterial Communities of the Coronal Sulcus and Distal Urethra of Adolescent Males
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0036298 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David E. Nelson, Qunfeng Dong, Barbara Van Der Pol, Evelyn Toh, Baochang Fan, Barry P. Katz, Deming Mi, Ruichen Rong, George M. Weinstock, Erica Sodergren, J. Dennis Fortenberry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 25% |
| Chile | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 185 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 52 | 27% |
| Unknown | 33 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 14 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 44 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,742,236
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#21,295
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,865
of 180,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#338
of 3,875 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,875 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.