↓ Skip to main content

Inequality and Growth in a Developing Economy: Evidence from Regional Data (Spain, 1860–1930)

Overview of attention for article published in Social Science History, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Inequality and Growth in a Developing Economy: Evidence from Regional Data (Spain, 1860–1930)
Published in
Social Science History, January 2020
DOI 10.1017/ssh.2019.44
Authors

Francisco J. Beltrán Tapia, Julio Martinez-Galarraga

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 25%
Psychology 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#8,306,518
of 15,534,776 outputs
Outputs from Social Science History
#133
of 209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,027
of 288,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Science History
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,534,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.