You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How do organisations implement research impact assessment (RIA) principles and good practice? A narrative review and exploratory study of four international research funding and administrative organisations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-019-0515-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam Kamenetzky, Saba Hinrichs-Krapels |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 67% |
| Scientists | 7 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 22 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 25% |
| Unknown | 23 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,761,376
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#207
of 1,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,712
of 467,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#15
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.