You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bilateral dentigerous cyst in a non-syndromic patient: Report of an unusual case with review of the literature
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Pathology (0973029X), January 2011
|
DOI | 10.4103/0973-029x.80017 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Avinash Tamgadge, Sandhya Tamgadge, Daivat Bhatt, Sudhir Bhalerao, Treville Pereira, Mukul Padhye |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 25% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 20% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 15% |
Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 70% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#8,616,072
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Pathology (0973029X)
#99
of 442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,140
of 191,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Pathology (0973029X)
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.