↓ Skip to main content

AAPM TG 191: Clinical use of luminescent dosimeters: TLDs and OSLDs

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Physics, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
AAPM TG 191: Clinical use of luminescent dosimeters: TLDs and OSLDs
Published in
Medical Physics, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/mp.13839
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen F. Kry, Paola Alvarez, Joanna E. Cygler, Larry A. DeWerd, Rebecca M. Howell, Sanford Meeks, Jennifer O'Daniel, Chester Reft, Gabriel Sawakuchi, Eduardo G. Yukihara, Dimitris Mihailidis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 253 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Student > Master 27 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Researcher 25 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 4%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 100 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 74 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Unspecified 7 3%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 114 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,472,959
of 25,637,545 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#832
of 7,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,936
of 478,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#17
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,637,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,997 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.