You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gold nanoparticle based double-labeling of melanoma extracellular vesicles to determine the specificity of uptake by cells and preferential accumulation in small metastatic lung tumors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-020-0573-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pablo Lara, Sujey Palma-Florez, Edison Salas-Huenuleo, Iva Polakovicova, Simón Guerrero, Lorena Lobos-Gonzalez, America Campos, Luis Muñoz, Carla Jorquera-Cordero, Manuel Varas-Godoy, Jorge Cancino, Eloísa Arias, Jaime Villegas, Luis J. Cruz, Fernando Albericio, Eyleen Araya, Alejandro H. Corvalan, Andrew F. G. Quest, Marcelo J. Kogan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| South Africa | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 131 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 47 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 15 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 50 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2020.
All research outputs
#14,185,904
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#479
of 1,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,903
of 453,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#11
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,465 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.