You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic assessment of fluid responsiveness during early septic shock resuscitation: secondary analysis of the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-2732-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eduardo Kattan, Gustavo A. Ospina-Tascón, Jean-Louis Teboul, Ricardo Castro, Maurizio Cecconi, Giorgio Ferri, Jan Bakker, Glenn Hernández |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 13 | 16% |
| United States | 9 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 7% |
| Spain | 5 | 6% |
| France | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 61 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 13% |
| Scientists | 8 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 172 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 35 | 20% |
| Unknown | 47 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 57 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#763,128
of 25,534,033 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#546
of 6,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,037
of 477,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#16
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,534,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.