↓ Skip to main content

夜間痛を合併した肩関節周囲炎の臨床的特徴

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Therapy Japan, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
夜間痛を合併した肩関節周囲炎の臨床的特徴
Published in
Physical Therapy Japan, April 2017
DOI 10.15063/rigaku.11080
Authors

赤羽根 良和, 永田 敏貢, 齊藤 正佳, 篠田 光俊

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2020.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Physical Therapy Japan
#151
of 297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,955
of 325,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Therapy Japan
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 297 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.