↓ Skip to main content

Phenotypic and Functional Changes in Blood Monocytes Following Adherence to Endothelium

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phenotypic and Functional Changes in Blood Monocytes Following Adherence to Endothelium
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037091
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colin Tso, Kerry-Anne Rye, Philip Barter

Abstract

Blood monocytes are known to express endothelial-like genes during co-culture with endothelium. In this study, the time-dependent change in the phenotype pattern of primary blood monocytes after adhering to endothelium is reported using a novel HLA-A2 mistyped co-culture model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Other 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2012.
All research outputs
#14,144,226
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#115,543
of 193,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,162
of 163,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,180
of 3,849 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,849 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.