↓ Skip to main content

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor administration for subfertile women undergoing assisted reproduction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor administration for subfertile women undergoing assisted reproduction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013226.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohan S Kamath, Richard Kirubakaran, Sesh Kamal Sunkara

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 50 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 57 46%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2022.
All research outputs
#5,771,278
of 23,372,207 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,736
of 12,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,580
of 453,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#119
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,372,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.