↓ Skip to main content

Estimating Error and Bias in Offline Evaluation Results

Overview of attention for article published in arXiv, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimating Error and Bias in Offline Evaluation Results
Published in
arXiv, March 2020
DOI 10.1145/3343413.3378004
Authors

Mucun Tian, Michael D. Ekstrand

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Student > Master 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2020.
All research outputs
#22,771,990
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#673,438
of 915,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#336,546
of 390,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#15,439
of 22,101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 915,148 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22,101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.