↓ Skip to main content

Neuroanatomical Variability of Religiosity

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
9 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuroanatomical Variability of Religiosity
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0007180
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dimitrios Kapogiannis, Aron K. Barbey, Michael Su, Frank Krueger, Jordan Grafman

Abstract

We hypothesized that religiosity, a set of traits variably expressed in the population, is modulated by neuroanatomical variability. We tested this idea by determining whether aspects of religiosity were predicted by variability in regional cortical volume. We performed structural magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in 40 healthy adult participants who reported different degrees and patterns of religiosity on a survey. We identified four Principal Components of religiosity by Factor Analysis of the survey items and associated them with regional cortical volumes measured by voxel-based morphometry. Experiencing an intimate relationship with God and engaging in religious behavior was associated with increased volume of R middle temporal cortex, BA 21. Experiencing fear of God was associated with decreased volume of L precuneus and L orbitofrontal cortex BA 11. A cluster of traits related with pragmatism and doubting God's existence was associated with increased volume of the R precuneus. Variability in religiosity of upbringing was not associated with variability in cortical volume of any region. Therefore, key aspects of religiosity are associated with cortical volume differences. This conclusion complements our prior functional neuroimaging findings in elucidating the proximate causes of religion in the brain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 163 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Professor 12 7%
Other 52 29%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 11%
Neuroscience 12 7%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 25 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2020.
All research outputs
#725,371
of 25,880,422 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#9,671
of 224,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,750
of 109,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#32
of 528 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 528 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.