You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exempting low-risk health and medical research from ethics reviews: comparing Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States and the Netherlands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-019-0520-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Mae Scott, Simon Kolstoe, M. C. ( Corrette) Ploem, Zoë Hammatt, Paul Glasziou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 20% |
| Australia | 10 | 18% |
| Canada | 5 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 4% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Ghana | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 46% |
| Scientists | 22 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 21 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,190,937
of 24,653,581 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#110
of 1,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,382
of 462,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#9
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,653,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.