You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Climate change risk perceptions and the problem of scale: evidence from cross-national survey experiments
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Politics, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1080/09644016.2019.1708538 |
Authors |
Endre Tvinnereim, Ole Martin Lægreid, Xiaozi Liu, Daigee Shaw, Christopher Borick, Erick Lachapelle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 4 | 18% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 18% |
Mexico | 2 | 9% |
Australia | 2 | 9% |
Canada | 2 | 9% |
Belgium | 1 | 5% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 5% |
New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 45% |
Scientists | 9 | 41% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
Researcher | 5 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 21% |
Unknown | 22 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 24 | 30% |
Psychology | 6 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 27 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,623,818
of 25,253,876 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Politics
#249
of 934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,755
of 467,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Politics
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,253,876 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.