You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of hydrologic impact of an irrigation curtailment program using Landsat satellite data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Hydrological Processes, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/hyp.13708 |
| Authors |
Naga Manohar Velpuri, Gabriel B. Senay, Matthew Schauer, C. Amanda Garcia, Ramesh K. Singh, MacKenzie Friedrichs, Stefanie Kagone, Jonathan Haynes, Terrence Conlon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 30% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Thailand | 1 | 5% |
| Belize | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 85% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 3 | 17% |
| Engineering | 3 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,822,328
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Hydrological Processes
#169
of 1,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,351
of 458,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrological Processes
#12
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.