↓ Skip to main content

Impact of HPV vaccination and cervical screening on cervical cancer elimination: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
634 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of HPV vaccination and cervical screening on cervical cancer elimination: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries
Published in
The Lancet, February 2020
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30068-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc Brisson, Jane J Kim, Karen Canfell, Mélanie Drolet, Guillaume Gingras, Emily A Burger, Dave Martin, Kate T Simms, Élodie Bénard, Marie-Claude Boily, Stephen Sy, Catherine Regan, Adam Keane, Michael Caruana, Diep T N Nguyen, Megan A Smith, Jean-François Laprise, Mark Jit, Michel Alary, Freddie Bray, Elena Fidarova, Fayad Elsheikh, Paul J N Bloem, Nathalie Broutet, Raymond Hutubessy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 634 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 28%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Other 10 9%
Professor 6 5%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Mathematics 4 4%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 26 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 626. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2020.
All research outputs
#14,684
of 15,574,170 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#405
of 34,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#589
of 289,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#44
of 476 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,574,170 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 476 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.