↓ Skip to main content

Impact of HPV vaccination and cervical screening on cervical cancer elimination: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
633 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of HPV vaccination and cervical screening on cervical cancer elimination: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries
Published in
The Lancet, February 2020
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30068-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc Brisson, Jane J Kim, Karen Canfell, Mélanie Drolet, Guillaume Gingras, Emily A Burger, Dave Martin, Kate T Simms, Élodie Bénard, Marie-Claude Boily, Stephen Sy, Catherine Regan, Adam Keane, Michael Caruana, Diep T N Nguyen, Megan A Smith, Jean-François Laprise, Mark Jit, Michel Alary, Freddie Bray, Elena Fidarova, Fayad Elsheikh, Paul J N Bloem, Nathalie Broutet, Raymond Hutubessy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 633 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 175 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 23%
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Other 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 7%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 30 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 40 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 626. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2020.
All research outputs
#16,536
of 16,326,085 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#447
of 35,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#626
of 316,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#44
of 476 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,326,085 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 476 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.