The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 603 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of HPV vaccination and cervical screening on cervical cancer elimination: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30068-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marc Brisson, Jane J Kim, Karen Canfell, Mélanie Drolet, Guillaume Gingras, Emily A Burger, Dave Martin, Kate T Simms, Élodie Bénard, Marie-Claude Boily, Stephen Sy, Catherine Regan, Adam Keane, Michael Caruana, Diep T N Nguyen, Megan A Smith, Jean-François Laprise, Mark Jit, Michel Alary, Freddie Bray, Elena Fidarova, Fayad Elsheikh, Paul J N Bloem, Nathalie Broutet, Raymond Hutubessy |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 37 | 6% |
| Mexico | 24 | 4% |
| Japan | 20 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 10 | 2% |
| Canada | 9 | 1% |
| France | 9 | 1% |
| Spain | 8 | 1% |
| Australia | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 65 | 11% |
| Unknown | 401 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 486 | 81% |
| Scientists | 68 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 38 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 868 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 868 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 114 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 85 | 10% |
| Researcher | 78 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 7% |
| Other | 42 | 5% |
| Other | 123 | 14% |
| Unknown | 364 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 188 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 75 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 55 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 2% |
| Other | 109 | 13% |
| Unknown | 391 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 672. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2024.
All research outputs
#33,462
of 26,377,159 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#720
of 43,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#891
of 480,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#36
of 385 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,377,159 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 385 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.