↓ Skip to main content

Multi-decadal patterns of vegetation succession after tundra fire on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Research Letters (ERL), January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multi-decadal patterns of vegetation succession after tundra fire on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska
Published in
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), January 2020
DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab5f49
Authors

Gerald V Frost, Rachel A Loehman, Lisa B Saperstein, Matthew J Macander, Peter R Nelson, David P Paradis, Susan M Natali

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 30%
Environmental Science 8 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 22%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2020.
All research outputs
#10,571,486
of 16,995,670 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#3,498
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,843
of 330,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,995,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.