↓ Skip to main content

Multi-decadal patterns of vegetation succession after tundra fire on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Research Letters (ERL), January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multi-decadal patterns of vegetation succession after tundra fire on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska
Published in
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), January 2020
DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab5f49
Authors

Gerald V Frost, Rachel A Loehman, Lisa B Saperstein, Matthew J Macander, Peter R Nelson, David P Paradis, Susan M Natali

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 22%
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 38%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 22%
Environmental Science 6 19%
Unspecified 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2020.
All research outputs
#9,600,929
of 15,663,032 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#2,996
of 3,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,216
of 292,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,663,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.