↓ Skip to main content

Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
27 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001754.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucky Saraswat, Haroon Rehman, Muhammad Imran Omar, June D Cody, Patricia Aluko, Cathryn Ma Glazener

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 203 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Student > Master 20 10%
Other 19 9%
Researcher 15 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 83 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Sports and Recreations 5 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 89 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,333,798
of 25,378,284 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,837
of 12,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,684
of 467,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.