↓ Skip to main content

Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
31 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001754.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucky Saraswat, Haroon Rehman, Muhammad Imran Omar, June D Cody, Patricia Aluko, Cathryn MA Glazener

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 14%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 12 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2020.
All research outputs
#902,181
of 15,550,283 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,536
of 11,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,774
of 288,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,550,283 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.