↓ Skip to main content

Adipose-Derived Stem Cells as a Tool in Cell-Based Therapies

Overview of attention for article published in Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adipose-Derived Stem Cells as a Tool in Cell-Based Therapies
Published in
Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00005-016-0394-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Bajek, Natalia Gurtowska, Joanna Olkowska, Lukasz Kazmierski, Malgorzata Maj, Tomasz Drewa

Abstract

Recent development in stem cell isolation methods and expansion under laboratory conditions create an opportunity to use those aforementioned cells in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Particular attention is drawn towards mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) being multipotent progenitors exhibiting several unique characteristics, including high proliferation potential, self-renewal abilities and multilineage differentiation into cells of mesodermal and non-mesodermal origin. High abundance of MSCs found in adipose tissue makes it a very attractive source of adult stem cells for further use in regenerative medicine applications. Despite immunomodulating properties of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) and a secretion of a wide variety of paracrine factors that facilitate tissue regeneration, effectiveness of stem cell therapy was not supported by the results of clinical trials. Lack of a single, universal stem cell marker, patient-to-patient variability, heterogeneity of ASC population combined with multiple widely different protocols of cell isolation and expansion hinder the ability to precisely identify and analyze biological properties of stem cells. The above issues contribute to conflicting data reported in literature. We will review the comprehensive information concerning characteristic features of ASCs. We will also review the regenerative potential and clinical application based on various clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 226 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 17%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 12%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 10%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 53 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 15%
Engineering 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 55 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2016.
All research outputs
#6,224,814
of 22,870,727 outputs
Outputs from Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis
#76
of 385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,178
of 312,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,870,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 385 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.