↓ Skip to main content

Consensus of the 'Malasars' traditional aboriginal knowledge of medicinal plants in the Velliangiri holy hills, India

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consensus of the 'Malasars' traditional aboriginal knowledge of medicinal plants in the Velliangiri holy hills, India
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, March 2008
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-4-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Subramanyam Ragupathy, Newmaster G Steven, Murugesan Maruthakkutti, Balasubramaniam Velusamy, Muneer M Ul-Huda

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 4 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 134 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 23%
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Lecturer 8 6%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 29 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 31%
Social Sciences 12 9%
Environmental Science 11 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 42 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2017.
All research outputs
#6,975,501
of 22,870,727 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#276
of 736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,048
of 81,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,870,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them