↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011628.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grace Obeid, Giao Do, Lisa Kirby, Carolyn Hughes, Emilie Sbidian, Laurence Le Cleach

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 132 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 16%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Researcher 10 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 45 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 47 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,739,112
of 19,394,767 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,919
of 11,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,239
of 351,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,394,767 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.