↓ Skip to main content

Emergence of a Small-World Functional Network in Cultured Neurons

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Emergence of a Small-World Functional Network in Cultured Neurons
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002522
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia H. Downes, Mark W. Hammond, Dimitris Xydas, Matthew C. Spencer, Victor M. Becerra, Kevin Warwick, Ben J. Whalley, Slawomir J. Nasuto

Abstract

The functional networks of cultured neurons exhibit complex network properties similar to those found in vivo. Starting from random seeding, cultures undergo significant reorganization during the initial period in vitro, yet despite providing an ideal platform for observing developmental changes in neuronal connectivity, little is known about how a complex functional network evolves from isolated neurons. In the present study, evolution of functional connectivity was estimated from correlations of spontaneous activity. Network properties were quantified using complex measures from graph theory and used to compare cultures at different stages of development during the first 5 weeks in vitro. Networks obtained from young cultures (14 days in vitro) exhibited a random topology, which evolved to a small-world topology during maturation. The topology change was accompanied by an increased presence of highly connected areas (hubs) and network efficiency increased with age. The small-world topology balances integration of network areas with segregation of specialized processing units. The emergence of such network structure in cultured neurons, despite a lack of external input, points to complex intrinsic biological mechanisms. Moreover, the functional network of cultures at mature ages is efficient and highly suited to complex processing tasks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 4 2%
Germany 3 1%
United States 3 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belarus 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 236 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 27%
Researcher 42 16%
Student > Master 35 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 6%
Professor 12 5%
Other 42 16%
Unknown 41 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 52 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 20%
Engineering 38 15%
Physics and Astronomy 18 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 5%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 46 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,080,169
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#6,487
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,577
of 176,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#69
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.