↓ Skip to main content

The European Court of Human Rights, Transitional Justice and Historical Abuse in Consolidated Democracies

Overview of attention for article published in Human Rights Law Review, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 314)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The European Court of Human Rights, Transitional Justice and Historical Abuse in Consolidated Democracies
Published in
Human Rights Law Review, February 2020
DOI 10.1093/hrlr/ngz032
Authors

James Gallen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,227,011
of 14,322,412 outputs
Outputs from Human Rights Law Review
#39
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,399
of 161,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Rights Law Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,322,412 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them