↓ Skip to main content

Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 91,844)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)
Title
Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag
Published in
bioRxiv
DOI 10.1101/2020.01.30.927871
Authors

Pradhan, Prashant, Pandey, Ashutosh Kumar, Mishra, Akhilesh, Gupta, Parul, Tripathi, Praveen Kumar, Menon, Manoj Balakrishnan, Gomes, James, Vivekanandan, Perumal, Kundu, Bishwajit

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17,046 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14306. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2020.
All research outputs
#21
of 15,608,299 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#1
of 91,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3
of 289,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#1
of 6,124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,608,299 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.