↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for chronic pruritus of unknown origin

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for chronic pruritus of unknown origin
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013128.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Andrade, Chii Yang Kuah, Juliana Esther Martin-Lopez, Shunjie Chua, Volha Shpadaruk, Gloria Sanclemente, Juan VA Franco

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 181 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 15%
Student > Master 25 14%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 56 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Psychology 9 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 61 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,883,788
of 16,514,094 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,280
of 11,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,324
of 321,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,514,094 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.