↓ Skip to main content

Recompression and adjunctive therapy for decompression illness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recompression and adjunctive therapy for decompression illness
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005277.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael H Bennett, Jan P Lehm, Simon J Mitchell, Jason Wasiak

Abstract

Decompression illness (DCI) is due to bubble formation in the blood or tissues following the breathing of compressed gas. Clinically, DCI may range from a trivial illness to loss of consciousness, death or paralysis. Recompression is the universally accepted standard treatment of DCI. When recompression is delayed, a number of strategies have been suggested in order to improve the outcome.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2014.
All research outputs
#9,860,558
of 12,346,102 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,598
of 8,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,249
of 114,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#80
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,346,102 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.