You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Limited engagement with transparent and open science standards in the policies of pain journals: a cross-sectional evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111296 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aidan G Cashin, Matthew K Bagg, Georgia C Richards, Elaine Toomey, James H McAuley, Hopin Lee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 22% |
| United States | 7 | 10% |
| Australia | 7 | 10% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 52% |
| Scientists | 19 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 6 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#778,898
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#99
of 1,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,317
of 478,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.