↓ Skip to main content

Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations of the lung: an epithelial transcriptomic approach

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations of the lung: an epithelial transcriptomic approach
Published in
Respiratory Research, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12931-020-1306-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillaume Lezmi, Shamila Vibhushan, Claudia Bevilaqua, Nicolas Crapart, Nicolas Cagnard, Naziha Khen-Dunlop, Christine Boyle-Freyssaut, Alice Hadchouel, Christophe Delacourt

Abstract

The pathophysiology of congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations (CCAM) of the lung remains poorly understood. This study aimed to identify more precisely the molecular mechanisms limited to a compartment of lung tissue, through a transcriptomic analysis of the epithelium of macrocystic forms. Tissue fragments displaying CCAM were obtained during planned surgical resections. Epithelial mRNA was obtained from cystic and normal areas after laser capture microdissection (LCM). Transcriptomic analyses were performed and the results were confirmed by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry in independent samples. After controlling for RNA quality, we analysed the transcriptomes of six cystic areas and five control areas. In total, 393 transcripts were differentially expressed in the epithelium, between CCAM and control areas. The most highly redundant genes involved in biological functions and signalling pathways differentially expressed between CCAM and control epithelium included TGFB2, TGFBR1, and MAP 2 K1. These genes were considered particularly relevant as they have been implicated in branching morphogenesis. RT-qPCR analysis confirmed in independent samples that TGFBR1 was more strongly expressed in CCAM than in control tissues (p < 0.03). Immunohistochemistry analysis showed TGFBR1 (p = 0.0007) and TGFB2 (p < 0.02) levels to be significantly higher in the epithelium of CCAM than in that of control tissues. This compartmentalised transcriptomic analysis of the epithelium of macrocystic lung malformations identified a dysregulation of TGFB signalling at the mRNA and protein levels, suggesting a possible role of this pathway in CCAM pathogenesis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01732185.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Computer Science 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Unknown 7 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2020.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#2,216
of 3,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,437
of 469,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#64
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.