↓ Skip to main content

Risk and protective factors for psychotic experiences in adolescence: a population-based study

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Medicine, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk and protective factors for psychotic experiences in adolescence: a population-based study
Published in
Psychological Medicine, February 2020
DOI 10.1017/s0033291719004136
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elaine M. McMahon, Paul Corcoran, Helen Keeley, Mary Clarke, Helen Coughlan, Danuta Wasserman, Christina W. Hoven, Vladimir Carli, Marco Sarchiapone, Colm Healy, Mary Cannon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Researcher 10 8%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 46 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 22%
Unspecified 14 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 8%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 52 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,423,533
of 25,260,058 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Medicine
#1,199
of 5,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,145
of 463,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Medicine
#25
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,260,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.