↓ Skip to main content

Disability, Home Physical Environment and Non-Fatal Injuries among Young Children in China

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Disability, Home Physical Environment and Non-Fatal Injuries among Young Children in China
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037766
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui-ping Zhu, Xin Xia, Hui-yun Xiang, Chuan-hua Yu, Yu-kai Du

Abstract

We compared the patterns of medically attended injuries between children with and without disabilities and explored the residential environment risks in five counties of Hubei Province in the People's Republic of China by a 1:1 matched case-control study based on the biopsychosocial model of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health--ICF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 2%
India 1 1%
Unknown 89 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 17%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 23 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 22%
Social Sciences 12 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Psychology 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 27 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2012.
All research outputs
#18,306,425
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#153,775
of 193,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,099
of 163,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,022
of 3,845 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,845 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.