↓ Skip to main content

Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006282.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renske I Wadman, W Ludo van der Pol, Wendy MJ Bosboom, Fay-Lynn Asselman, Leonard H van den Berg, Susan T Iannaccone, Alexander FJE Vrancken

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 153 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 13%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 46 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Neuroscience 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 48 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,531,029
of 16,936,654 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,003
of 11,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,143
of 329,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,936,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.