↓ Skip to main content

Plasticity of Adult Human Pancreatic Duct Cells by Neurogenin3-Mediated Reprogramming

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plasticity of Adult Human Pancreatic Duct Cells by Neurogenin3-Mediated Reprogramming
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037055
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathalie Swales, Geert A. Martens, Stefan Bonné, Yves Heremans, Rehannah Borup, Mark Van de Casteele, Zhidong Ling, Daniel Pipeleers, Philippe Ravassard, Finn Nielsen, Jorge Ferrer, Harry Heimberg

Abstract

Duct cells isolated from adult human pancreas can be reprogrammed to express islet beta cell genes by adenoviral transduction of the developmental transcription factor neurogenin3 (Ngn3). In this study we aimed to fully characterize the extent of this reprogramming and intended to improve it.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 75 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 26%
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 18%
Chemistry 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 8 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,077,509
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#57,692
of 193,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,006
of 163,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#841
of 3,792 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,792 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.