You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Serum profiling by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry as a diagnostic tool for domoic acid toxicosis in California sea lions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proteome Science, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-5956-10-18 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Benjamin A Neely, Jennifer L Soper, Denise J Greig, Kevin P Carlin, Elizabeth G Favre, Frances MD Gulland, Jonas S Almeida, Michael G Janech |
Abstract |
There are currently no reliable markers of acute domoic acid toxicosis (DAT) for California sea lions. We investigated whether patterns of serum peptides could diagnose acute DAT. Serum peptides were analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry from 107 sea lions (acute DAT n = 34; non-DAT n = 73). Artificial neural networks (ANN) were trained using MALDI-TOF data. Individual peaks and neural networks were qualified using an independent test set (n = 20). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Norway | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 41 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 20% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Professor | 5 | 11% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
Other | 8 | 18% |
Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 38% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 8 | 18% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2012.
All research outputs
#13,361,046
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Proteome Science
#82
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,165
of 159,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proteome Science
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them