↓ Skip to main content

Head-to-Head Comparison of Left Ventricular Function Assessment with 64-Row Computed Tomography, Biplane Left Cineventriculography, and Both 2- and 3-Dimensional Transthoracic Echocardiography

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Head-to-Head Comparison of Left Ventricular Function Assessment with 64-Row Computed Tomography, Biplane Left Cineventriculography, and Both 2- and 3-Dimensional Transthoracic Echocardiography
Published in
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), May 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.046
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johannes Greupner, Elke Zimmermann, Andrea Grohmann, Hans-Peter Dübel, Till Althoff, Adrian C. Borges, Wolfgang Rutsch, Peter Schlattmann, Bernd Hamm, Marc Dewey

Abstract

This study was designed to compare the accuracy of 64-row contrast computed tomography (CT), invasive cineventriculography (CVG), 2-dimensional echocardiography (2D Echo), and 3-dimensional echocardiography (3D Echo) for left ventricular (LV) function assessment with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 102 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Researcher 17 16%
Other 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 25 23%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 58%
Engineering 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 28 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2016.
All research outputs
#5,421,293
of 17,364,317 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#7,523
of 13,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,566
of 132,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#42
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,364,317 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.