↓ Skip to main content

Gut Pathology and Responses to the Microsporidium Nosema ceranae in the Honey Bee Apis mellifera

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
209 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gut Pathology and Responses to the Microsporidium Nosema ceranae in the Honey Bee Apis mellifera
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Dussaubat, Jean-Luc Brunet, Mariano Higes, John K. Colbourne, Jacqueline Lopez, Jeong-Hyeon Choi, Raquel Martín-Hernández, Cristina Botías, Marianne Cousin, Cynthia McDonnell, Marc Bonnet, Luc P. Belzunces, Robin F. A. Moritz, Yves Le Conte, Cédric Alaux

Abstract

The microsporidium Nosema ceranae is a newly prevalent parasite of the European honey bee (Apis mellifera). Although this parasite is presently spreading across the world into its novel host, the mechanisms by it which affects the bees and how bees respond are not well understood. We therefore performed an extensive characterization of the parasite effects at the molecular level by using genetic and biochemical tools. The transcriptome modifications at the midgut level were characterized seven days post-infection with tiling microarrays. Then we tested the bee midgut response to infection by measuring activity of antioxidant and detoxification enzymes (superoxide dismutases, glutathione peroxidases, glutathione reductase, and glutathione-S-transferase). At the gene-expression level, the bee midgut responded to N. ceranae infection by an increase in oxidative stress concurrent with the generation of antioxidant enzymes, defense and protective response specifically observed in the gut of mammals and insects. However, at the enzymatic level, the protective response was not confirmed, with only glutathione-S-transferase exhibiting a higher activity in infected bees. The oxidative stress was associated with a higher transcription of sugar transporter in the gut. Finally, a dramatic effect of the microsporidia infection was the inhibition of genes involved in the homeostasis and renewal of intestinal tissues (Wnt signaling pathway), a phenomenon that was confirmed at the histological level. This tissue degeneration and prevention of gut epithelium renewal may explain early bee death. In conclusion, our integrated approach not only gives new insights into the pathological effects of N. ceranae and the bee gut response, but also demonstrate that the honey bee gut is an interesting model system for studying host defense responses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 259 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 17%
Researcher 44 16%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 55 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 131 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 9%
Environmental Science 11 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 2%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 72 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2013.
All research outputs
#7,953,590
of 23,940,484 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#99,167
of 205,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,087
of 166,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,535
of 3,854 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,940,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,854 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.