↓ Skip to main content

Different infusion durations for preventing platinum-induced hearing loss in children with cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different infusion durations for preventing platinum-induced hearing loss in children with cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010885.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jorrit W van As, Henk van den Berg, Elvira C van Dalen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 26%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Psychology 3 4%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 18 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,734,570
of 18,456,414 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,384
of 11,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,124
of 345,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,456,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.