↓ Skip to main content

Cephalic version by moxibustion for breech presentation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cephalic version by moxibustion for breech presentation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003928.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meaghan E Coyle, Caroline A Smith, Brian Peat

Abstract

Moxibustion (a type of Chinese medicine which involves burning a herb close to the skin) to the acupuncture point Bladder 67 (BL67) (Chinese name Zhiyin), located at the tip of the fifth toe, has been proposed as a way of correcting breech presentation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Unknown 144 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 25%
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Unspecified 11 7%
Other 36 24%
Unknown 13 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 17%
Unspecified 14 9%
Psychology 6 4%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 13 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
#474,058
of 13,011,469 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,509
of 10,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,626
of 119,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,011,469 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.