You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of Genetic Markers as Instruments for Mendelian Randomization Studies on Vitamin D
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0037465 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diane J. Berry, Karani S. Vimaleswaran, John C. Whittaker, Aroon D. Hingorani, Elina Hyppönen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Iceland | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 26% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2012.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#147,948
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,512
of 180,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,257
of 3,820 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,820 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.