↓ Skip to main content

Sexual Harassment and Discrimination Experiences of Academic Medical Faculty

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
166 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
410 tweeters
facebook
22 Facebook pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sexual Harassment and Discrimination Experiences of Academic Medical Faculty
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, May 2016
DOI 10.1001/jama.2016.2188
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reshma Jagsi, Kent A. Griffith, Rochelle Jones, Chithra R. Perumalswami, Peter Ubel, Abigail Stewart

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 410 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 186 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 27 15%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Other 46 25%
Unknown 33 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 36%
Social Sciences 17 9%
Psychology 13 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 54 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1621. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,341
of 17,717,881 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#137
of 29,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59
of 271,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#6
of 428 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,717,881 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 428 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.